Back to Blog
Ceph
Home Lab
Storage
Distributed Storage
Cost Optimization
What's the Most Cost-Effective Way to Run Ceph at Home?
November 18, 2025
9 min read read
It starts the way most homelab adventures do — you mess with something in a VM long enough that the itch to build it for real becomes unbearable. That's where one user found themselves, asking the r/homelab crowd: what's the most cost-effective way to build Ceph?
The responses weren't just helpful; they painted a snapshot of how regular folks are building reliable, distributed storage at home without spending like an enterprise IT department. And the variations are as wild as you'd expect: old pizza box servers, mini-PCs, NVMe-backed flash arrays, all somehow roped into Ceph clusters.
If you're heading down this path, here's what people are doing, what actually works, and where it all gets expensive — fast.
## The Range of Builds: From Desk Drawers to Datacenter Leftovers
One of the most low-cost setups came from someone running Ceph on four Dell Optiplex 7010 mini-PCs. Each box had a dedicated 2.5Gbit adapter and its own SSD. Simple, tight, effective. They admitted performance wasn't going to win any benchmark trophies, but for real-world use — particularly a few VMs that couldn't afford to lose data — it was more than enough.
The beauty of this build? You get isolation across nodes, dedicated storage, and a separate networking pipe for Ceph traffic — all without loud, power-hungry rack gear. But of course, there's a ceiling. "It doesn't scale well," they said. "I'll probably notice degradation once I hit 10+ VMs with noticeable I/O."
Someone else chimed in with a slightly more polished take: three Topton MS-01 boards, each loaded with NVMe drives and 25G NICs. This setup used six SSDs per node for Ceph and separate SSDs for the OS. They even tacked on USB SATA drives for additional storage layers. Not as wallet-friendly, but the performance leap is obvious.
Then came a user with not one but two Ceph clusters. One was an all-flash setup in a Supermicro 217 chassis, rocking 6x 2.5-inch bays per node. That was their main cluster for VM disk images and container storage. They estimated about $250 per node, excluding storage — which is still relatively affordable when you think about what it's doing. The other cluster? Just some 1U Supermicro boxes with basic 3.5-inch SATA HDDs, built purely for backups and redundant copies. Each node cost about $75.
The thread showed a pattern: people are either building Ceph from the ground up with lightweight, power-efficient nodes — or recycling older enterprise hardware and giving it new life with a layer of distributed intelligence.
## Don't Cheap Out Where It Hurts
The thread made something else clear: you can go cheap, but not everywhere. Networking matters — a lot. The person with the Optiplex mini-PCs said plainly that their 2.5Gbit link would be the bottleneck eventually. Anyone still trying to get away with 1Gbit links will hit performance walls almost immediately once they push Ceph beyond basic workloads.
Storage matters too. SSDs are common in most of the builds shared, but the really effective setups split OS drives and Ceph drives. One user went as far as dedicating M.2 slots to Ceph OSDs while reserving SATA or USB-attached drives for backups. That separation seems to make a noticeable difference.
And finally, scaling strategy matters. While you can start small — two or three nodes — Ceph really starts to shine when it has more space to breathe. The guy with the Supermicro clusters noted that he'd happily expand if he had the budget. Which says a lot: it worked well enough that he'd invest more if he could.
## The Pros, The Cons, and the Tradeoffs
The core advantage? Cost. Most of the builds in the thread hover between $75 to $250 per node. That's laughably low when compared to what real enterprise clusters go for. And because Ceph is software-defined, you get redundancy, scalability, and decent performance without shelling out for proprietary SANs.
Another plus? You actually learn something. One of the users emphasized skipping Proxmox's built-in Ceph tooling entirely and setting up the cluster manually. "You actually learn what you're working with when you set it up yourself," they said. That sentiment echoed through the thread — Ceph is not a plug-and-play toy. If you're serious about it, expect to get your hands dirty.
But the cons are just as clear. Performance will take a hit if you don't plan for network overhead. Cheap nodes also mean higher failure risk. And scaling from three to six to nine nodes isn't just about plugging in more machines — it's about keeping the network clean, the data replicated, and the recovery times reasonable.
Another drawback? Power and noise. Older 1U servers are cheap and easy to find, but they're loud and draw more power than you'd think. Unless you've got a basement rack or soundproofed room, that "cost-effective" gear will come at the expense of peace and quiet.
## Ceph Isn't for Everyone — But It's Definitely for Some
A final, thoughtful response came from someone comparing Ceph to MinIO as an on-prem object storage alternative. Their cloud bills — particularly API call charges — had become so inflated that they were exploring in-house options using Kubernetes, Ceph, or MinIO.
They asked the community whether they should go all-in on local node storage or mix in SAN-based backends. That's a whole separate blog post, but the takeaway is relevant: Ceph isn't just for homelab tinkerers. When done right, it can become a serious tool for offloading cloud workloads and reducing cost — at scale.
That context makes the homelab versions even more impressive. If you can build a modest, resilient Ceph setup at home with a couple of mini-PCs, a few SSDs, and a fast network card — imagine what you could do in a small business environment.
## The Bottom Line
So, what's the most cost-effective way to run Ceph at home?
Based on the real-world builds shared by the community, it's probably a cluster of three to four low-power nodes, each with dedicated SSDs and at least 2.5Gbit networking. Reuse what you've got, buy storage slowly, and stay away from trying to make Ceph do everything at once.
It's not about building the fastest or the biggest. It's about building something smart. And if that sounds like you, then welcome — you're officially in the Ceph club.
Keep Exploring
Your 25GbE Dream Is Slamming Into a Wall: The Brutal Truth About My 3-Node Ceph Cluster
A 3-node Proxmox + Ceph lab with enterprise NVMe and 25GbE looked perfect on paper, but benchmark ceilings exposed the practical bottlenecks that matter most in small clusters.
Ceph, StarWind, Synology: How I Accidentally Tried Every Storage Idea at Once
A story about running Ceph, StarWind VSAN, and Synology simultaneously—not by design, but because every attempt to simplify storage somehow added another layer instead.
Why Your Proxmox Migration Failed (Hint: It Wasn't Proxmox)
Most failed Proxmox migrations aren't Proxmox failures at all. They're the result of assumptions VMware spent 15 years teaching us to make — and infrastructure that stopped hiding its complexity.
Ceph, StarWind, or Something Else? The Awkward Middle Ground of HA Storage in Proxmox
When you want your Proxmox storage to 'just stay up' during node failures, you hit the awkward middle ground between Ceph, StarWind VSAN, clustered filesystems, and DIY NAS solutions. Here's why none of them feel quite right.